Ellen Marakowitz, a lecturer in the Department of Anthropology at Columbia University and a member of the Columbia IRB, reviews Ethical Imperialism for Academe, the magazine of the American Association of University Professors. She finds it "a well-documented history of the impact of institutional review boards on social science research in the United States," but wishes I had paid more attention to IRBs' potential to help researchers "think critically about their practices, including potential risks to subjects."
[Ellen Marakowitz, "Regulated Research" (Review of Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009 by Zachary M. Schrag), Academe November-December 2012.]
Saturday, December 1, 2012
Marakowitz Reviews Ethical Imperialism
Posted by
Zachary M. Schrag
at
9:53 PM
Labels:
aaup,
anthropology,
confidentiality,
ethical imperialism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Interesting thought, but I think it is IRBs' responsibility to promote their (unmet) 'potential to help researchers "think critically about their practices, including potential risks to subjects"' - rather than historians'.
Post a Comment