Alice Dreger is soliciting advice “for a young scholar thinking of starting a blog.” My wife and I have each maintained blogs for several years, and here’s what we’ve come up with.
Thursday, January 21, 2016
Advice on Scholarly Blogging
Sunday, January 17, 2016
Political Scientists Complain about Lost Exemption
Political scientists and law professors are protesting the proposed elimination of the current exemption for research about public officials and candidates for office. The drafters may have eliminated the exemption by mistake, thinking that such research was exempted by other provisions of the proposed rule, which turns out not to be the case.
Posted by
Zachary M. Schrag
at
11:03 AM
Labels:
deception,
exemptions,
interviews,
NPRM,
political science,
pool,
public officials
0
comments
Friday, January 1, 2016
My NPRM Comments
Perhaps 2016 will be the year when OHRP makes good on its 2007 promise to “give more guidance on how to make the decision on what is research and what is not,” in the form of a promulgated revision to the Common Rule. If so, Happy New Year, OHRP!
Wth these hopes, I have submitted my own comments on the NPRM. I have posted a copy of the PDF I submitted, and below is a web version with links.
Posted by
Zachary M. Schrag
at
12:15 PM
Labels:
appeals,
Belmont,
Canada,
critical inquiry,
empirical research,
ethnography,
exclusion,
exempt,
history,
interviewing,
NPRM,
OHRP,
oral history,
reform,
regulations
0
comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)