Report on Research Compliance has spotted a notice on the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs website suggesting that a proposed rule on "Human Subjects Research Protections: Enhancing Protections for Research Subjects and Reducing Burden, Delay, and Ambiguity for Investigators" has reached OIRA and is awaiting EO 12866 Regulatory Review.
Don't ask me what this means in terms of a timetable, but it sounds as though the process is moving forward.
Monday, March 23, 2015
NPRM Jumps White House Fence
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
QI Focus Groups: Ditch Generalizability Criterion
Focus groups of professionals engaged in quality improvement (QI) or comparative effectiveness research (CER) report that the Common Rule's "generalizable knowledge" standard does not provide clear guidance.
[Whicher, Danielle, Nancy Kass, Yashar Saghai, Ruth Faden, Sean Tunis, and Peter Pronovost. “The Views of Quality Improvement Professionals and Comparative Effectiveness Researchers on Ethics, IRBs, and Oversight.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Published online before print, February 23, 2015, doi:10.1177/1556264615571558.]
[Whicher, Danielle, Nancy Kass, Yashar Saghai, Ruth Faden, Sean Tunis, and Peter Pronovost. “The Views of Quality Improvement Professionals and Comparative Effectiveness Researchers on Ethics, IRBs, and Oversight.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Published online before print, February 23, 2015, doi:10.1177/1556264615571558.]
Posted by
Zachary M. Schrag
at
10:58 AM
Labels:
definitions,
generalizable,
quality improvement
0
comments


Monday, March 2, 2015
IRB Asked, USB or FireWire. Silly, but Is It Bullying?
Caleb Carr, assistant professor of communication at Illinois State University, argues that abusive IRBs are best thought of as bullies.
[Carr, Caleb T. “Spotlight on Ethics: Institutional Review Boards as Systemic Bullies.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37 (2015): 1–16. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.991530.]
Though IRBs are a legally required element of many higher education institutions and an important ethical part of all, their overextension of unchecked power is creating a hostile work environment for many social scientists, and calling them for what they are – systemic bullies – can empower administrators and faculties to finally respond to the increasing calls for IRB reform.
[Carr, Caleb T. “Spotlight on Ethics: Institutional Review Boards as Systemic Bullies.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37 (2015): 1–16. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.991530.]
Posted by
Zachary M. Schrag
at
1:51 PM
Labels:
communication,
computers,
horror stories,
inconsistency,
nitpicking
1 comments


Sunday, March 1, 2015
University of Queensland Punishes Researchers, Won't Say Why
The University of Queensland demoted a professor and blocked him and another researcher from publishing findings, based on charges that they had not obtained necessary ethics clearances. But the university will not explain its conduct.
[Jorge Branco. “UQ Suppressed Bus Racism Study: Academics.” Brisbane Times, February 27, 2015. Thanks to Michelle Meyer for tweeting this to my attention.]
[Jorge Branco. “UQ Suppressed Bus Racism Study: Academics.” Brisbane Times, February 27, 2015. Thanks to Michelle Meyer for tweeting this to my attention.]
Posted by
Zachary M. Schrag
at
8:54 AM
Labels:
Australia,
consent,
deception,
departmental review,
economics,
horror stories,
legality,
queensland
0
comments


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)