Nathan Emmerich of Queen's University, UK, reviews Ethical Imperialism, Behind Closed Doors, and The Seduction of Ethics for Research Ethics.
[Emmerich, Nathan. “Between the Accountable and the Auditable: Ethics and Ethical Governance in the Social Sciences.” Research Ethics 9, no. 4 (December 2013): 175–186. doi:10.1177/1747016113510654.]
Emmerich is particularly frustrated by the lack of accountability of research ethics committees:
"The review process renders research accountable whilst, at the same time, erasing any trace of its own accountability (Stark: 73) or, we might say, its own status as an ethical endeavour . . .
"How systems of governance should themselves be held responsible − to researchers, to research participants, and to society as a whole − remains uninterrogated by applied ethical thinking."
No comments:
Post a Comment
To be published, a comment must include the author's first and last names, and institutional affiliation as appropriate. It must also be responsive to the post to which it is attached. Thanks.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.